3 Replies to “SL Share Extends To Flickr And Twitter But What Next For SL Profiles?”

  1. “whereas Facebook is still in the bah humbug arena regarding pseudonyms.”

    True, but also largely irrelevant in the scheme of things.

    There is a large number of people in SL who have no problem in using SL Share to Facebook and in linking their SL and RL identities.

    And I can comfortably say it is a large number, as the recent block Facebook placed on uploading photos with SLurls to their service cropped up just after Firestorm (with an estimated 200,000 SL users) introduced the 4.6.1 release, which was the first Firestorm version to include SL Share.

    I have it on good authority (from outside of LL), that as a result, there was something of a sharp rise in the use of the FB API gateway, which apparently in turn prompted them to poke at things and then say to LL “Oi, no unreal locations!”

    So I agree, FB’s position on identity (and even locations) is questionable – but doesn’t change the fact than many use the option.

    “However, what of Second Life users own profiles?”

    I’m hoping the snapshot floater may yet get an overhaul to add the FB / Flickr / Twitter photo capabilities. However, I can’t help but feel the profile feeds are going the way of the Dodo …

  2. I wish LL would introduce the SnapChat concept to the Feeds.

    Pep (So all the ghastly, embarassing and kitsch images would disappear after 10 seconds.)

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Follow

Get the latest posts delivered to your mailbox: